Close

February 9, 2015

So much for that much vaunted 2012 study

Scientists retract paper because they’re “not satisfied with the quality of some of the data” – Retraction Watch

“The corresponding author has sought retraction of this work from ARS. The author statement is copied below:

We, the authors, wish to retract “Cigarette Smoke–induced Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress Impairs VEGF- and Fluid Shear Stress–Mediated Signaling in Endothelial Cells” by Edirisinghe et al (Antioxid Redox Signal, 12(12): 1355-1369. doi:10.1089/ars.2009.2874) because we are not satisfied with the quality of some of the data presented in the paper. Overall, however, the data are reproducible and the conclusions drawn were not affected. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused to the readers.

The paper has been cited 18 times, according to Thomson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge.We tried to reach Rahman for more information but haven’t heard back from him yet. We’d like to know in particular why it took three years for the authors to figure out that they published an article with subpar data — and how those data could in turn be reproducible, exactly.

via Scientists retract paper because they’re “not satisfied with the quality of some of the data” – Retraction Watch at Retraction Watch.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *